Former Employee Sued Sirius XM Over Parental Leave

A six-year veteran filed a lawsuit alleging his termination was retaliation for taking three months of leave.

Updated on Sept. 23, 2026 in Remote Work

Bold flat-color editorial illustration depicting a massive, minimalist stone courthouse facade, evoking the institutional gravity of federal labor litigation.
Dashiell Lunde filed a federal lawsuit against Sirius XM Holdings Inc., alleging his termination was unlawful retaliation for taking parental leave. AI Illustration. Upload story photo >

Live Poll

Do you trust that employers respect the legal right of employees to take parental leave?

Dashiell Lunde filed a federal lawsuit against Sirius XM Holdings Inc. alleging his termination was unlawful retaliation for taking parental leave. The suit claims violations of federal, state, and local labor protections for employees.

Why it matters

The case highlights the operational friction surrounding employee leave policies and the legal risk businesses face when termination follows a protected absence. Operators must ensure performance management documentation remains objective to defend against retaliation claims.

The plaintiff, a former Sirius XM employee, worked at the firm for 6 years and took a 3-month parental leave before his termination. The lawsuit alleges violations of federal, New York state, and New York City labor laws.

The players

Sirius XM Holdings Inc.

A major satellite radio and audio entertainment company with a large workforce subject to federal and state labor regulations.

Dashiell Lunde

A former employee who served in his role for six years before his termination.

The details

The plaintiff alleges that despite receiving positive performance reviews and merit bonuses throughout his six-year tenure, his managers sabotaged his career. He claims this culminated in his firing as retaliation for his three-month parental leave, which began in December 2025. The lawsuit, filed in US District Court, asserts that Sirius XM breached the federal Family and Medical Leave Act alongside New York state and local discrimination statutes.

Timeline

  1. December 2025: The plaintiff began his three-month parental leave.

  2. September 22, 2026: The plaintiff filed the lawsuit in US District Court.

Market Landscape

This litigation highlights the ongoing enforcement of the federal Family and Medical Leave Act in corporate settings. It follows a consistent trend of legal scrutiny regarding how businesses manage transitions for employees returning from protected leaves.

Owners and managers should verify that their documentation of performance issues is consistent and contemporaneous to mitigate risk during and after protected employee leaves. Consult with qualified employment counsel to ensure leave policies strictly align with federal, state, and local standards.

The takeaway

The case serves as a reminder that positive performance history can complicate termination efforts if leave policies are poorly managed. Operators should review their leave-of-absence protocols to ensure they are consistently applied and clearly separated from performance-based evaluations.

Further reading

For more on managing workforce policies, visit our Remote Work section.

Source note: This article includes information reported by Bloomberglaw.

Live Poll

Do you trust that employers respect the legal right of employees to take parental leave?

Former Employee Sued Sirius XM Over Parental Leave