Senator Proposed Minnesota Diesel Tax Relief
Agricultural operators in Minnesota could see fuel cost relief if the governor suspends the state's 32-cent diesel tax.
Updated on Oct. 1, 2026 in Agriculture
Live Poll
Should states reduce fuel taxes to provide financial relief to local farmers?
Senator Aric Putnam has requested tax relief for farmers to combat rising fuel expenses. The proposal seeks to leverage an executive order or legislative action to reduce the state's 32-cent per gallon diesel tax.
Why it matters
Farmers in Minnesota are currently grappling with financial strain from elevated diesel costs, drought, and trade tariffs. This move aims to lower operating overhead by addressing one of the most volatile input costs in agriculture.
Current diesel prices exceed $6.00 per gallon, nearly doubling the $3.50 per gallon cost from September 2025. The proposal targets the 32-cent-per-gallon Minnesota state diesel tax to provide immediate relief for the state's agricultural sector.
The players
Aric Putnam
Aric Putnam serves as the chair of the Minnesota Senate Agriculture Committee and is spearheading the call for fuel tax relief.
Tim Walz
Tim Walz is the Governor of Minnesota who holds the authority to issue an executive order or call a special legislative session.
The details
The proposal calls for the governor to declare an emergency, granting the authority to issue an executive order that would reduce or suspend the state's diesel fuel tax. Alternatively, the relief could be achieved through a special legislative session. This mechanism mimics a measure already enacted by the governor of North Dakota to alleviate similar cost pressures on regional producers.
Timeline
Senator Aric Putnam called for the diesel tax relief measures in September 2026.
Diesel fuel cost approximately three dollars and fifty cents per gallon in September 2025.
Market Landscape
This effort to provide state-level fuel relief follows the pattern set by North Dakota's governor-enacted diesel tax reduction measure. State-level intervention is increasingly being tested as a response to sustained inflationary pressure on critical agricultural inputs.
Agricultural operators should monitor communications from the governor's office regarding a potential emergency declaration or special session. Factoring this potential 32-cent per gallon savings into Q4 and 2027 fuel budget projections may be prudent while awaiting an official decision.
The takeaway
Rising fuel costs continue to compress margins for Minnesota producers, making state tax adjustments a primary lever for short-term relief. Operators should track the status of the executive order and audit their fuel procurement costs against the current 32-cent tax benchmark.
Further reading
For more on sector trends, visit the Agriculture section.
Source note: This article includes information reported by KNSI.
Live Poll
Should states reduce fuel taxes to provide financial relief to local farmers?
