Judge Allowed Jury to Hear Telework Bias Claim
The ruling creates a path for litigation against employers who deny remote work as a disability accommodation.
Updated on Sept. 29, 2026 in Remote Work
Live Poll
Should employers be required to offer telework as a reasonable accommodation for employees with disabilities?
A Georgia federal judge ruled that the EEOC can take a disability discrimination case regarding telework to a jury. The lawsuit centers on a former utility services employee who requested remote work following a stroke.
Why it matters
The decision underscores the legal risk for operators who deny remote work requests from employees seeking disability accommodations under the ADA. This ruling marks a pivot point where juries will now decide if telework constitutes a reasonable accommodation in practice.
A federal court allowed a single telework discrimination claim to advance to a jury trial, narrowing the scope of a broader EEOC lawsuit against a utility company. Other disability discrimination claims within the same case were dismissed by the judge.
The players
EEOC
The federal agency tasked with enforcing laws against workplace discrimination and harassment.
United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
The federal judicial body presiding over the litigation between the EEOC and the employer.
The details
The court denied summary judgment on the specific claim that the employer failed to accommodate an employee with a stroke via telework. By clearing this claim for trial, the court determined there is sufficient evidence for a jury to evaluate if the company’s denial of remote work violated the Americans with Disabilities Act. Other claims brought by the EEOC were pared from the suit, leaving the telework accommodation issue as the central point of contention.
Timeline
September 28, 2026: The federal judge issued the ruling.
Market Landscape
This case sits at the intersection of evolving workplace flexibility and the Americans with Disabilities Act. It marks a departure from cases where remote work claims were resolved through summary judgment without a full jury trial.
Operators should review their internal procedures for evaluating remote work as a reasonable accommodation for disabled employees. Clear documentation of the interactive process is now a critical shield against potential jury-led litigation.
The takeaway
The court's decision signals that denials of telework for ADA-protected workers face a higher risk of reaching a jury trial. Review existing accommodation request logs to ensure the interactive process with staff is well-documented and consistent.
Further reading
For more on the legal standards governing flexible employment, visit our Remote Work section.
Source note: This article includes information reported by Law360.
Live Poll
Should employers be required to offer telework as a reasonable accommodation for employees with disabilities?
