Trinidad and Venezuela Pursued Energy Cooperation Pact
The diplomatic reset aims to streamline regional gas supply chains despite persistent territorial disputes.
Updated on Sept. 24, 2026 in Oil and Gas
Live Poll
Is it a good time for Caribbean nations to deepen energy integration with Venezuela?
Trinidad and Tobago and Venezuela have engaged in a diplomatic reset to advance energy cooperation, including finalized gas-supply terms for the Aphrodite field. This agreement targets regional energy corridor needs as both nations navigate complex fiscal and commercial negotiations.
Why it matters
The collaboration aims to stabilize energy supply chains for operators in the region by formalizing cross-border project terms. Successfully navigating these infrastructure connections is essential for mitigating risks associated with the ongoing territorial tensions.
The new Aphrodite field gas-supply terms represent a 400% increase in value compared to previous agreements. Meanwhile, commercial and fiscal frameworks for the Dragon and Manakin-Cocuina fields remain unresolved.
The players
Shell
A global energy major with significant operations in upstream gas and offshore exploration projects.
NGC
The National Gas Company of Trinidad and Tobago, which manages the country's natural gas infrastructure.
The details
The diplomatic effort focuses on bridging energy infrastructure gaps between the two nations through regional engagement. Shell and the National Gas Company (NGC) negotiated the Aphrodite field terms, which are intended to secure future supply flows. However, the Essequibo dispute continues to serve as a significant point of contention that complicates broader regional integration for operators.
Timeline
December 2026 marks the target restart for Dragon Gas field operations.
Q2 2027 is the date for expected first production from the Aphrodite field.
Early 2027 is when the ICJ ruling on Essequibo proceedings is expected.
Market Landscape
The push for energy cooperation follows the trajectory set by the 2024 International Court of Justice Essequibo proceedings. This reset marks an attempt to advance infrastructure projects despite the regional instability defined by that territorial dispute.
Operators with exposure to regional energy infrastructure should monitor fiscal negotiations regarding the Dragon and Manakin-Cocuina projects as these will define the viability of future gas corridor access. Factor in the late 2026 and 2027 project milestones when modeling regional energy availability.
The takeaway
The diplomatic reset suggests a pathway to securing regional supply despite underlying geopolitical tensions. Operators should track the upcoming ICJ ruling in early 2027 as a key signal for the long-term security of cross-border infrastructure investments.
Further reading
For more on the shifts impacting global supply chains, see our section on Oil and Gas.
Source note: This article includes information reported by Caribbean360.
Live Poll
Is it a good time for Caribbean nations to deepen energy integration with Venezuela?
